<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Your Photography Published, the Lazy Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coderhump.com/archives/270/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coderhump.com/archives/270</link>
	<description>Game Development Technology, in Flash and Elsewhere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Uland</title>
		<link>http://coderhump.com/archives/270/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Uland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderhump.com/?p=270#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I forbid you to use my visage in the red nose cymbalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forbid you to use my visage in the red nose cymbalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Garney</title>
		<link>http://coderhump.com/archives/270/comment-page-1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Garney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderhump.com/?p=270#comment-15</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re in the UK (or anywhere else that restricts photography) then your options are limited. But several of the pictures of mine that got picked up do not feature identifiable people (for instance, the Spruce Goose, the smaller plane, the Samurai!). And none of them are self-portraits. :) So I think you could do OK despite restrictive laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#39;re in the UK (or anywhere else that restricts photography) then your options are limited. But several of the pictures of mine that got picked up do not feature identifiable people (for instance, the Spruce Goose, the smaller plane, the Samurai!). And none of them are self-portraits. <img src='http://coderhump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  So I think you could do OK despite restrictive laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://coderhump.com/archives/270/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderhump.com/?p=270#comment-14</guid>
		<description>PPS The next time I see you hanging over the garden fence with your telephoto lens taking picture sof me in the jacuzzi, you will here from my layer Mr. Garney :)&lt;br&gt;I have got to go there is some people in white coats at the door !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPS The next time I see you hanging over the garden fence with your telephoto lens taking picture sof me in the jacuzzi, you will here from my layer Mr. Garney <img src='http://coderhump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />I have got to go there is some people in white coats at the door !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://coderhump.com/archives/270/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderhump.com/?p=270#comment-13</guid>
		<description>That is all very well and good but what if you have to deal with the data protection act like in the UK. If a photograph makes the person identifiable with details such as there name and is not for personal use, then it requires permission to take which would also explain that the photographs would be made available for public viewing and use.&lt;br&gt;Do you have any spare consent forms? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then you could have the case when two people create the photograph such as &lt;br&gt;[1]&quot;If you make a photograph with two or more people and each persons contribution to the photograph is not distinct, then you all become joint authors and joint first owners of copyright and the permission of each joint owner will be needed before such a photograph can be used.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also I think there are too many internet stalker types added to this I do not want to make my electronic paper any bigger, telling people where I go, who are my friends and images of family members. You may say I am paranoid but when you live in country  where&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[2]&quot;The biggest source of surveillance in Britain is through the network of CCTV (closed-circuit television) cameras. On average, an individual will appear on 300 CCTV cameras during a day and those tapes are kept by many organisations for indefinite lengths of time. &quot;&lt;br&gt;I am worn out from having my picture taken.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ps I am not photogenic :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[1]http://www.ipo.gov.uk/copy/c-applies/c-photo.htm&lt;br&gt;[2]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2571041/How-Big-Brother-watches-your-every-move.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is all very well and good but what if you have to deal with the data protection act like in the UK. If a photograph makes the person identifiable with details such as there name and is not for personal use, then it requires permission to take which would also explain that the photographs would be made available for public viewing and use.<br />Do you have any spare consent forms? </p>
<p>Then you could have the case when two people create the photograph such as <br />[1]&#8220;If you make a photograph with two or more people and each persons contribution to the photograph is not distinct, then you all become joint authors and joint first owners of copyright and the permission of each joint owner will be needed before such a photograph can be used.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also I think there are too many internet stalker types added to this I do not want to make my electronic paper any bigger, telling people where I go, who are my friends and images of family members. You may say I am paranoid but when you live in country  where</p>
<p>[2]&#8220;The biggest source of surveillance in Britain is through the network of CCTV (closed-circuit television) cameras. On average, an individual will appear on 300 CCTV cameras during a day and those tapes are kept by many organisations for indefinite lengths of time. &#8220;<br />I am worn out from having my picture taken.</p>
<p>ps I am not photogenic <img src='http://coderhump.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>[1]http://www.ipo.gov.uk/copy/c-applies/c-photo.htm<br />[2]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2571041/How-Big-Brother-watches-your-every-move.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
